A Dynamic System Model for Multi-Echelon Inventory Policy Optimization Considering Bullwhip Effect and Supply chain Disruptions in the Sport Footwear Industry

  • Dedy Setyo oetomo Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana
  • Rizky Fajar Ramdhani
  • Asep Hermawan
Keywords: Supply chain, System Dynamic

Abstract

This research develops a dynamic system model to optimize inventory policies in multi-echelon supply chains within the sport footwear industry, addressing challenges from the bullwhip effect and supply chain disruptions. The sports footwear sector faces unique inventory management challenges due to complex demand patterns influenced by seasonality, fashion trends, and competitive dynamics. Our comprehensive system dynamics model captures the intricate relationships between four supply chain echelons: retailers, distributors, manufacturers, and raw material suppliers. The model integrates machine learning algorithms—specifically Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks—for adaptive demand prediction and employs genetic algorithm optimization to determine optimal inventory parameters under various disruption scenarios. Using real-world data from a leading sports footwear manufacturer, we validated the model under normal operations and three distinct disruption scenarios: raw material shortages (45% reduction for 6 weeks), manufacturing capacity constraints (30% reduction for 8 weeks), and transportation disruptions (doubled lead times for 4 weeks). Results demonstrate that our proposed hybrid model reduces overall inventory costs by 18.7% compared to traditional policies while maintaining a 97.2% service level. The integration of machine learning for demand forecasting reduced prediction errors by 43.6% compared to conventional methods, directly mitigating the bullwhip effect by decreasing the order variability coefficient from 0.89 to 0.61 at the supplier level. Furthermore, the model enhanced supply chain resilience by reducing recovery time by 42% following major disruptions. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of complex supply chain dynamics and practical applications for inventory management in volatile industries, offering a robust framework for decision-making under uncertainty.

References

H. L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang, “ Information distortion in a supply chain : The Bullwhip effect,” Manage Sci, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1875–1886, 2004.

S. Chopra and M. S. Sodhi, “reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions” MIT Sloan Manage Rev , vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 73–80, 2014.

D. Ivanov, “ Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains : A simulation – based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) Case,” Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev, vol. 136, no. 101922, 2020.

A. Ghadge, S. Dani, M. Chester, and R. Kalawsky, “A systems approach for modelling supply chain risks,” Supply chain Managemnt : An International Journal, , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 382–389, 2019.

F. Sahin and E. P. Robinson, “ Flow Coordination and information sharing in supply chain : Review, Implication, and directions for future research,” Decision Sciences, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 505–536, 2002.

D. Simchi-Levi, W. Schmidt, and Y. Wei, “ From superstorms to factory fires : Managing unpredictable supply chain disruptions,” Harv Bus Rev, vol. 93, no. 1/2, pp. 96–101, 2015.

J. D. Sterman, Business dynamics : System thinking and modelling for a complex. McGraw-Hill Education, 2000.

A. Dolgui, D. Ivanov, and B. Sokolov, “ Ripple effect in the supply chain : An Analysis and recent literature,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 56, no. 1–2, pp. 414–430, 2018.

Barlas, Y., & Gunduz,B. (2011). Demand forecasting and sharing strategies to reduces fluctuations and the bullwhip effect in supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(3), 458-473

Kim,I., & Springer, M. (2008). Measuring endogenous supply chain volatility : Beyond the bullwhip effect. European Journal of the Operational Research, 189(1), 172-193.

Min, H., & Zhou, G. (2002). Supply chain modelling : Past, Present and future. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 43(1-2), 231-249.

Syntetos, A. A., Boylan, J. E., & Disney, S. M. (2009). Forecasting for inventory planning : a 50-year review. Journal of the Operational Reasearch Society, 60(sup1), S149-S160.

Tang, C.S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488.

Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S. J., & Fosso-Wamba, S. (2017). The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1108-1118.

Wang, X., & Disney, S.M. (2016). The Bullwhip effect : Progress , trends and directions. European Journal of Operational Reasearch, 250(3), 691-701.

Zhou, L., Zhao, X., Xiao, T., & Yao, J. (2019). A hybrid artificial neural network model for forecasting supply chain resilience. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(9), 5603-5616

Published
2025-05-12
How to Cite
oetomo, D. S., Fajar Ramdhani, R., & Hermawan, A. (2025). A Dynamic System Model for Multi-Echelon Inventory Policy Optimization Considering Bullwhip Effect and Supply chain Disruptions in the Sport Footwear Industry. Jurnal Teknologika, 15(1), 629-642. https://doi.org/10.51132/teknologika.v15i1.447